<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bad TV Adverts, Bad Ads &#187; patronising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/tag/patronising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bad-ads.co.uk</link>
	<description>Rants Against Bad Television Adverts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 13:52:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Envirofone</title>
		<link>http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/envirofone-102</link>
		<comments>http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/envirofone-102#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Vision</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising Idiots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economical with the Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[envirofone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patronising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is such as stupid advert it makes me wince every time I see it. It is a succession of idiots trying to persuade you consume more in the guise of saving the planet. A succession of media created characterless morons, including an annoying Essexified woman out of Eastenders, explain how sending your perfectly good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such as stupid advert it makes me wince every time I see it. It is a succession of idiots trying to persuade you consume more in the guise of saving the planet.<br />
A succession of media created characterless morons, including an annoying Essexified woman out of Eastenders, explain how sending your perfectly good phone is a good idea for the environment and will help you make some extra money. Worst of all is a stupid spiky-haired effeminate punk with red hair, a goatee beard and a gapped tooth like Terry-Thomas, who says, &#8216;Soooo last year&#8217;. It makes my blood boil. </p>
<p><object width="500" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0sJW0LKXeOE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;hd=1&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0sJW0LKXeOE&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;hd=1&#038;border=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="315"></embed></object></p>
<p>The worst thing about the advert is that it is completely at odds with the concept of being good for the environment. The first principle of environmental thinking before reuse and recycling is to cut back on the consumption of resources. Surely this would mean don&#8217;t buy a new phone because it is, heavens, a year old. Carry on using your phone until it is so outdated that it no longer works. The idea of sending an almost new, perfectly usable phone to be resold is morally wrong.<br />
If you do have a phone that is more than a year-old, then the chances are you won&#8217;t be grinning inanely with a cheque because it is worth almost nothing.<br />
 <strong>Random Posts:</strong>
<ul class="random-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/micro-force-shaver-advert-238" rel="bookmark" title="March 26, 2010">Micro-Force Shaver Advert</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/we-buy-any-car-com-138" rel="bookmark" title="October 27, 2009">We Buy Any Car (.com)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/adverts-from-art-374" rel="bookmark" title="May 25, 2011">Adverts from Art</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/most-annoying-advert-in-history-61" rel="bookmark" title="July 22, 2009">Most Annoying Advert in History</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Random Posts took 12.880 ms -->
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bad-ads.co.uk%2Fenvirofone-102"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bad-ads.co.uk%2Fenvirofone-102&amp;source=bad_ads&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/envirofone-102/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Annoying Advert in History</title>
		<link>http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/most-annoying-advert-in-history-61</link>
		<comments>http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/most-annoying-advert-in-history-61#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terry Vision</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Most Annoying Ever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adverts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annoying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patronising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the most annoying advert in history? An advert so bad that you remember it long after it has ceased being shown. My candidate has to be the AOL adverts. At this time the Internet was still a novelty and most people used a dial-up connection to get online. To some people even connecting [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the most annoying advert in history? An advert so bad that you remember it long after it has ceased being shown. My candidate has to be the AOL adverts. At this time the Internet was still a novelty and most people used a dial-up connection to get online.<br />
To some people even connecting to the internet was a techie thing to do. AOL decided that they would guide people with a computerised Mary Poppins character called Connie that would appear, uninvited, in your house and take control of your computer. Much like the annoying bastard paperclip, &#8216;Clippy&#8217; that used to appear when you began to type anything in Word except with an annoying bob haircut and whiny voice.</p>
<div id="attachment_72" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 134px"><img src="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/aol-connie.jpeg" alt="AOL Advert most annoying in History" title="aol-connie" width="124" height="94" class="size-full wp-image-72" /><p class="wp-caption-text">AOL Advert most annoying in History</p></div>
<p>Unfortunately, the video can only convey a fraction of the patronising, annoying quality of the adverts as there does not appear to be a copy of the original ad on YouTube. </p>
<p><object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZUtOnQmOsI0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZUtOnQmOsI0&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object></p>
<p>The reason why this advert is my nominee for the most annoying advert in history is Connie&#8217;s patronising attitude when &#8216;helping&#8217; people. As I recall, I think that she tells the man in a rather stern voice, &#8216;click here&#8217;. For all she knows the guy could be a CPU designer with a PhD in computer science. (Although this does beg the question why he chose AOL in the first place.)<br />
<img src="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/aol-connie2.jpg" alt="aol-connie2" title="aol-connie2" width="300" height="180" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-73" /></p>
<p>The other distinctive thing about this advert was her dress, which  had scrolling screenshots of various different website. There was a parody of the advert in which the screenshots were porn websites.<br />
Just like torture in a Chilean prison cell, the memory of this advert is still fresh in my brain even though the character was first shown in the late 1990s. If you can think of a better candidate for a more annoying advert then let me know.<strong>Random Posts:</strong>
<ul class="random-posts">
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/gambling-adverts-250" rel="bookmark" title="April 5, 2010">Gambling Adverts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/the-power-of-advertising-168" rel="bookmark" title="October 31, 2009">The Power of Advertising &#8211; Green Army!</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/discovery-channel-trailersadverts-58" rel="bookmark" title="July 19, 2009">Discovery Channel Trailers/Adverts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/expensive-model-lancaster-bomber-121" rel="bookmark" title="September 10, 2009">Expensive Model &#8211; Lancaster Bomber</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Random Posts took 16.477 ms -->
<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: left; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bad-ads.co.uk%2Fmost-annoying-advert-in-history-61"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bad-ads.co.uk%2Fmost-annoying-advert-in-history-61&amp;source=bad_ads&amp;style=normal&amp;service=is.gd&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bad-ads.co.uk/most-annoying-advert-in-history-61/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

